Pain point: Quantity deals behind a code

Multi-unit offers: what the research says about “Buy 3 for $Y”

Two peer-reviewed studies on multi-unit price promotions, and what BCG and McKinsey say a promotion can cost.

3 min read4 sources, linked at the end

4–5units: the quantity requirements with the largest effects, in one study

Peer-reviewedDrechsler et al., European Journal of Marketing (opens the source)Sources

A multi-unit offer asks for more than one unit in return for a better price: “3 for $12”, or “buy 2, get 1 free”. Two peer-reviewed studies look at how that wording and the number of units change what shoppers do. Both were read in the abstract only, so they give the direction of an effect, not its size.

Intentions go up, depending on the offer

Kenneth Manning and David Sprott ran experiments on promotions such as “5 for $5” on an item normally priced at $1.25. Across their experiments, the effect on how many units shoppers intended to buy depended on the quantity in the offer and on how quickly the product is used up. They also report that highlighting the single-unit price, the unrestricted nature of the offer, and the total savings did not change how well the offer worked.

What this does not show: it measured intentions in experiments, not real orders.

“X for $Y” beat “X + N free”

Salome Drechsler, Peter Leeflang, Tammo Bijmolt and Martin Natter compared “X for $Y” with “X + N free” and with a single-unit promotion. They combined store-level sales data from a large Dutch retail chain, covering four product categories, with a lab experiment. Their abstract reports that “X for $Y” outperformed “X + N free”, that quantity requirements of four to five units had the largest effects, and that the “X for $Y” advantage held for functional categories but not hedonic ones.

What this does not show: no effect size is in the abstract, and four categories at one chain say little about a Shopify store in another niche. Two- and three-unit tiers sit below the range with the largest effects in that study.

The cost side

A quantity price is a discount, and discounts have to earn their keep. BCG’s research on brick-and-mortar retailers found that 20 to 50 percent of promotions generate no noticeable lift in sales, and another 20 to 30 percent “dilute margins in that they don’t generate an increase in sales sufficient to offset promotion costs.”

McKinsey makes the same point in numbers. In its model of typical S&P 1500 economics, “volumes would have to rise by 18.7 percent just to offset the profit impact of a 5 percent price cut.” That is a large company’s arithmetic, not your store’s, but the direction applies: a tier that only reaches shoppers who would have bought several units anyway gives margin away.

What to take from it

  • Name the total for the quantity, “3 for $Y”, rather than a free unit, if you are choosing a format.
  • Check which products are bought repeatedly. The studies found the effect in functional categories.
  • Count how many orders already contain that many units before you set the discount.

What we checked

  1. SourceManning and Sprott, “Multiple unit price promotions and their effects on quantity purchase intentions”, Journal of Retailing 83(4) (abstract only)Open on rex.libraries.wsu.edu (opens the source)
  2. SourceDrechsler, Leeflang, Bijmolt and Natter, “Multi-unit price promotions and their impact on purchase decisions and sales”, European Journal of Marketing 51(5/6) (abstract only)Open on doi.org (opens the source)
  3. SourceBoston Consulting Group, “How Retailers Can Improve Promotion Effectiveness”, Goad, Robinson, Anta Callersten, Malby and Opstrup (full text)Open on web-assets.bcg.com (opens the source)
  4. SourceMcKinsey Quarterly, “The power of pricing”, Marn, Roegner and Zawada (also read as a PDF copy; full text)Open on mckinsey.com (opens the source)Open on leeds-faculty.colorado.edu (opens the source)
  5. Our checkWe have not run this test on any store, so this note makes no first-hand claim.